Quantum Bisimilarity via Barbs and Contexts: Curbing the Power of Non-Deterministic Observers

TL;DR

This paper introduces Linear Quantum CCS, a new quantum process calculus, and refines behavioral equivalences to align with quantum theory by restricting contexts to prevent unfeasible non-deterministic moves.

Contribution

It proposes a linear, asynchronous quantum calculus and develops a new bisimilarity that respects quantum principles while maintaining classical non-determinism.

Findings

Contexts can perform non-measurement moves that perturb quantum states

Refined bisimilarity aligns with quantum theory by restricting context behavior

First semantics satisfying both quantum compatibility and classical non-determinism

Abstract

Past years have seen the development of a few proposals for quantum extensions of process calculi. The rationale is clear: with the development of quantum communication protocols, there is a need to abstract and focus on the basic features of quantum concurrent systems, like CCS has done for its classical counterpart. So far, though, no accepted standard has emerged, neither for the syntax nor for the behavioural semantics. Indeed, the various proposals do not agree on what should be the observational properties of quantum values, and as a matter of fact, the soundness of such properties has never been validated against the prescriptions of quantum theory. To this aim, we introduce a new calculus, Linear Quantum CCS, and investigate the features of behavioural equivalences based on barbs and contexts. Our calculus can be thought of as an asynchronous, linear version of qCCS (based on value-passing CCS). Linearity ensures that each qubit is sent exactly once, precisely specifying which qubits of a process interact with the context. We exploit contexts to examine how bisimilarities relate to quantum theory. We show that the observational power of general contexts is incompatible with quantum theory: roughly, they can perform non-deterministic moves depending on quantum values without measuring (hence perturbing) them. Therefore, we refine the operational semantics in order to prevent contexts from performing unfeasible non-deterministic choices. This induces a coarser bisimilarity that better fits the quantum setting: (i) it lifts the indistinguishability of quantum states to the distributions of processes and, despite the additional constraints, (ii) it preserves the expressivity of non-deterministic choices based on classical information. To the best of our knowledge, our semantics is the first one that satisfies the two properties above.