Dimensions of Online Conflict: Towards Modeling Agonism
Matt Canute, Mali Jin, hannah holtzclaw, Alberto Lusoli, Philippa R, Adams, Mugdha Pandya, Maite Taboada, Diana Maynard, Wendy Hui Kyong Chun

TL;DR
This paper distinguishes between agonistic and hateful conflicts online, introduces a detailed annotation schema for conflict dimensions, and demonstrates that context-aware models can effectively identify different conflict types in Twitter conversations.
Contribution
It provides a new conceptual framework and a richly annotated dataset for modeling online conflict, along with robust models that incorporate conversational context.
Findings
Contextual labels improve conflict detection accuracy.
Models are robust across various controversial topics.
Annotated dataset enables nuanced analysis of online conflict.
Abstract
Agonism plays a vital role in democratic dialogue by fostering diverse perspectives and robust discussions. Within the realm of online conflict there is another type: hateful antagonism, which undermines constructive dialogue. Detecting conflict online is central to platform moderation and monetization. It is also vital for democratic dialogue, but only when it takes the form of agonism. To model these two types of conflict, we collected Twitter conversations related to trending controversial topics. We introduce a comprehensive annotation schema for labelling different dimensions of conflict in the conversations, such as the source of conflict, the target, and the rhetorical strategies deployed. Using this schema, we annotated approximately 4,000 conversations with multiple labels. We then trained both logistic regression and transformer-based models on the dataset, incorporating…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Social Media and Politics
MethodsLogistic Regression
