Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning for Power Network Topology Control

TL;DR

This paper introduces a hierarchical reinforcement learning framework for power network topology control, effectively managing high-dimensional action spaces and improving control performance on complex grid management tasks.

Contribution

The paper proposes a novel three-level HRL framework for power network control, combining rule-based, RL, and greedy policies across different abstraction levels.

Findings

Hierarchical RL agents outperform baseline methods on complex tasks

RL at intermediate and lowest levels yields best performance

Framework effectively manages high-dimensional action spaces in power networks

Abstract

Learning in high-dimensional action spaces is a key challenge in applying reinforcement learning (RL) to real-world systems. In this paper, we study the possibility of controlling power networks using RL methods. Power networks are critical infrastructures that are complex to control. In particular, the combinatorial nature of the action space poses a challenge to both conventional optimizers and learned controllers. Hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) represents one approach to address this challenge. More precisely, a HRL framework for power network topology control is proposed. The HRL framework consists of three levels of action abstraction. At the highest level, there is the overall long-term task of power network operation, namely, keeping the power grid state within security constraints at all times, which is decomposed into two temporally extended actions: 'do nothing' versus 'propose a topology change'. At the intermediate level, the action space consists of all controllable substations. Finally, at the lowest level, the action space consists of all configurations of the chosen substation. By employing this HRL framework, several hierarchical power network agents are trained for the IEEE 14-bus network. Whereas at the highest level a purely rule-based policy is still chosen for all agents in this study, at the intermediate level the policy is trained using different state-of-the-art RL algorithms. At the lowest level, either an RL algorithm or a greedy algorithm is used. The performance of the different 3-level agents is compared with standard baseline (RL or greedy) approaches. A key finding is that the 3-level agent that employs RL both at the intermediate and the lowest level outperforms all other agents on the most difficult task. Our code is publicly available.