Bias correction in multiple-systems estimation
Daan B. Zult, Peter G.M. van der Heijden, Bart F.M.Bakker

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new bias correction estimator for multiple-systems estimation with three or more sources, improving accuracy in small samples and impacting population size estimates.
Contribution
It extends Chapman's bias correction estimator to multiple sources beyond two, demonstrating superior performance through simulations and real data application.
Findings
The new estimator reduces bias significantly in small samples.
Simulation results show improved accuracy over existing estimators.
Application to homelessness data demonstrates practical impact.
Abstract
If part of a population is hidden but two or more sources are available that each cover parts of this population, dual- or multiple-system(s) estimation can be applied to estimate this population. For this it is common to use the log-linear model, estimated with maximum likelihood. These maximum likelihood estimates are based on a non-linear model and therefore suffer from finite-sample bias, which can be substantial in case of small samples or a small population size. This problem was recognised by Chapman, who derived an estimator with good small sample properties in case of two available sources. However, he did not derive an estimator for more than two sources. We propose an estimator that is an extension of Chapman's estimator to three or more sources and compare this estimator with other bias-reduced estimators in a simulation study. The proposed estimator performs well, and much…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsData-Driven Disease Surveillance · Census and Population Estimation · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
