Human-centred explanation of rule-based decision-making systems in the legal domain
Suzan Zuurmond, AnneMarie Borg, Matthijs van Kempen, Remi Wieten

TL;DR
This paper introduces a human-centered explanation method for rule-based legal decision systems, using a graph database to provide tailored, multimedia explanations in real-world applications.
Contribution
It presents a novel conceptual framework for developing explanation methods and demonstrates its application in a legal domain with a tailored, multimedia explanation approach.
Findings
Effective question-driven explanations using graph databases
Application to Dutch Tax and Customs scenario
Enhanced user understanding through multimedia explanations
Abstract
We propose a human-centred explanation method for rule-based automated decision-making systems in the legal domain. Firstly, we establish a conceptual framework for developing explanation methods, representing its key internal components (content, communication and adaptation) and external dependencies (decision-making system, human recipient and domain). Secondly, we propose an explanation method that uses a graph database to enable question-driven explanations and multimedia display. This way, we can tailor the explanation to the user. Finally, we show how our conceptual framework is applicable to a real-world scenario at the Dutch Tax and Customs Administration and implement our explanation method for this scenario.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSemantic Web and Ontologies · Recommender Systems and Techniques · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
