Context-aware feature attribution through argumentation
Jinfeng Zhong, Elsa Negre

TL;DR
This paper introduces CA-FATA, a novel, interpretable framework for feature attribution that incorporates user context through argumentation, improving accuracy and interpretability over existing methods.
Contribution
We propose CA-FATA, a new argumentation-based framework for context-aware feature attribution that explicitly models feature interactions and user context.
Findings
CA-FATA enhances interpretability with explicit semantics.
Incorporating user context improves attribution accuracy.
The framework supports integration of side information.
Abstract
Feature attribution is a fundamental task in both machine learning and data analysis, which involves determining the contribution of individual features or variables to a model's output. This process helps identify the most important features for predicting an outcome. The history of feature attribution methods can be traced back to General Additive Models (GAMs), which extend linear regression models by incorporating non-linear relationships between dependent and independent variables. In recent years, gradient-based methods and surrogate models have been applied to unravel complex Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems, but these methods have limitations. GAMs tend to achieve lower accuracy, gradient-based methods can be difficult to interpret, and surrogate models often suffer from stability and fidelity issues. Furthermore, most existing methods do not consider users' contexts, which…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning in Materials Science · Advanced Graph Neural Networks · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
MethodsLinear Regression
