Generative and Contrastive Paradigms Are Complementary for Graph Self-Supervised Learning

TL;DR

This paper introduces GCMAE, a unified framework combining generative and contrastive learning paradigms for graph self-supervised learning, leading to improved global and local graph representations.

Contribution

The paper proposes GCMAE, a novel framework that unifies MAE and CL for GSSL, capturing both local and global graph information through shared encoding and adjacency matrix reconstruction.

Findings

GCMAE outperforms 14 baselines across four graph tasks.

Maximum accuracy improvement of 3.2% over best baseline.

GCMAE effectively captures global and local graph features.

Abstract

For graph self-supervised learning (GSSL), masked autoencoder (MAE) follows the generative paradigm and learns to reconstruct masked graph edges or node features. Contrastive Learning (CL) maximizes the similarity between augmented views of the same graph and is widely used for GSSL. However, MAE and CL are considered separately in existing works for GSSL. We observe that the MAE and CL paradigms are complementary and propose the graph contrastive masked autoencoder (GCMAE) framework to unify them. Specifically, by focusing on local edges or node features, MAE cannot capture global information of the graph and is sensitive to particular edges and features. On the contrary, CL excels in extracting global information because it considers the relation between graphs. As such, we equip GCMAE with an MAE branch and a CL branch, and the two branches share a common encoder, which allows the MAE branch to exploit the global information extracted by the CL branch. To force GCMAE to capture global graph structures, we train it to reconstruct the entire adjacency matrix instead of only the masked edges as in existing works. Moreover, a discrimination loss is proposed for feature reconstruction, which improves the disparity between node embeddings rather than reducing the reconstruction error to tackle the feature smoothing problem of MAE. We evaluate GCMAE on four popular graph tasks (i.e., node classification, node clustering, link prediction, and graph classification) and compare with 14 state-of-the-art baselines. The results show that GCMAE consistently provides good accuracy across these tasks, and the maximum accuracy improvement is up to 3.2% compared with the best-performing baseline.