One-hot Generalized Linear Model for Switching Brain State Discovery
Chengrui Li, Soon Ho Kim, Chris Rodgers, Hannah Choi, Anqi Wu

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel prior-informed state-switching GLM that models dynamic neural interactions, capturing underlying anatomical constraints and improving interpretability and predictive performance in neural data analysis.
Contribution
It proposes a new prior-informed GLM with learnable priors that better reflect biological plausibility and reveal underlying neural connectomes.
Findings
Effectively recovers true interaction structures in simulations.
Achieves highest predictive likelihood on real neural data.
Enhances interpretability of neural interaction structures.
Abstract
Exposing meaningful and interpretable neural interactions is critical to understanding neural circuits. Inferred neural interactions from neural signals primarily reflect functional interactions. In a long experiment, subject animals may experience different stages defined by the experiment, stimuli, or behavioral states, and hence functional interactions can change over time. To model dynamically changing functional interactions, prior work employs state-switching generalized linear models with hidden Markov models (i.e., HMM-GLMs). However, we argue they lack biological plausibility, as functional interactions are shaped and confined by the underlying anatomical connectome. Here, we propose a novel prior-informed state-switching GLM. We introduce both a Gaussian prior and a one-hot prior over the GLM in each state. The priors are learnable. We will show that the learned prior should…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2024 poster
The paper is an original contribution for GLM models of neuron spike trains. The method and results are well-presented and clear. The figures and equations are clear. A number of baselines are compared and the results are consistent. From the results it would seem that the latent state inference is meaningful, this could be significant for neuroscientists who wish to study.
The synthetic study seems quite limited to the type of data the model is designed for (a single global state). It is not clear to me how well it will work if the neurons are organized into groups with their own state dynamics (which evolve largely independently) and only rarely communicate. I.e. the topology of the network could be loose connections between tightly interconnected subnetworks. A principled approach for the selection of the number of states is not discussed. At one point the pa
1. This paper proposed a novel OHG framework to estimate time-varying functional interaction in multi-state neural systems. The one-hot prior yielded better connectivity patterns and hidden states and provided more biological plausibility. 2. This paper provided detailed algorithms of the proposed model and conducted extensive experiments on both synthetic and real neural datasets to demonstrate its superiority.
1. This paper seems to propose two frameworks: the naïve one is GHG and the effective one is OHG. What’s the relationship between them? In the abstract, the authors only mention the two priors (Gaussian and one-hot) without the names of the frameworks. In the conclusion, only OHG is mentioned. Thus, it is confusing. 2. In the method, the authors first describe OHG and then introduce GHG. They are both variants of HMM-GLM but OHG outperforms GHG. Thus, the order seems unreasonable. What’s more, t
This paper is technically robust. The underlying problem is well-defined and builds upon a lineage of substantial research. Drawing insights from neuroscience, the authors convincingly argue that anatomical structures influence dynamic functional neural interactions. Their approach to address this hypothesis is adeptly framed, straightforward, and effective. The evaluation is comprehensive, encompassing a broad spectrum of models related to the problem, and it's tested across varied datasets. Th
(1) While the overall presentation of the paper is commendable, there is room for improvement in Sections 2 and 3. These sections could benefit from more intuitive and lucid explanations accompanying the mathematical equations, making it more accessible for readers. (2) I believe the prior work by Glaser et al. [1] deserves acknowledgment. It might also be valuable to include it in the comparative models, given that their focus on cluster (population) structures aligns with the theme of underly
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsNeural dynamics and brain function · Functional Brain Connectivity Studies · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
MethodsGLM
