Why Can Large Language Models Generate Correct Chain-of-Thoughts?
Rasul Tutunov, Antoine Grosnit, Juliusz Ziomek, Jun Wang, Haitham, Bou-Ammar

TL;DR
This paper provides a theoretical framework explaining how large language models can generate correct chains of thought, shedding light on their reasoning capabilities and performance improvements in complex tasks.
Contribution
It introduces a hierarchical graphical model and establishes a convergence rate to theoretically justify LLMs' ability to produce accurate reasoning sequences.
Findings
The model explains the likelihood of correct chain-of-thought generation.
A geometrical convergence rate is established for LLM reasoning.
The framework offers a theoretical basis for LLM reasoning performance.
Abstract
This paper delves into the capabilities of large language models (LLMs), specifically focusing on advancing the theoretical comprehension of chain-of-thought prompting. We investigate how LLMs can be effectively induced to generate a coherent chain of thoughts. To achieve this, we introduce a two-level hierarchical graphical model tailored for natural language generation. Within this framework, we establish a compelling geometrical convergence rate that gauges the likelihood of an LLM-generated chain of thoughts compared to those originating from the true language. Our findings provide a theoretical justification for the ability of LLMs to produce the correct sequence of thoughts (potentially) explaining performance gains in tasks demanding reasoning skills.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
