Application of deep learning for livestock behaviour recognition: A systematic literature review

TL;DR

This systematic review analyzes the application of deep learning models for livestock behaviour recognition, highlighting current methods, challenges, and future research directions in automating livestock health and welfare monitoring.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive analysis of 44 high-quality studies on deep learning for livestock behaviour recognition, identifying common models, challenges, and potential solutions.

Findings

Deep learning successfully recognized 13 behaviour classes.

CNN, YOLO, and ResNet are among the most used models.

Challenges include occlusion, data imbalance, and environmental complexities.

Abstract

Livestock health and welfare monitoring has traditionally been a labor-intensive task performed manually. Recent advances have led to the adoption of AI and computer vision techniques, particularly deep learning models, as decision-making tools within the livestock industry. These models have been employed for tasks like animal identification, tracking, body part recognition, and species classification. In the past decade, there has been a growing interest in using these models to explore the connection between livestock behaviour and health issues. While previous review studies have been rather generic, there is currently no review study specifically focusing on DL for livestock behaviour recognition. Hence, this systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted. The SLR involved an initial search across electronic databases, resulting in 1101 publications. After applying defined selection criteria, 126 publications were shortlisted. These publications were further filtered based on quality criteria, resulting in the selection of 44 high-quality primary studies. These studies were analysed to address the research questions. The results showed that DL successfully addressed 13 behaviour recognition problems encompassing 44 different behaviour classes. A variety of DL models and networks were employed, with CNN, Faster R-CNN, YOLOv5, and YOLOv4 being among the most common models, and VGG16, CSPDarknet53, GoogLeNet, ResNet101, and ResNet50 being popular networks. Performance evaluation involved ten different matrices, with precision and accuracy being the most frequently used. Primary studies identified challenges, including occlusion, adhesion, data imbalance, and the complexities of the livestock environment. The SLR study also discussed potential solutions and research directions to facilitate the development of autonomous livestock behaviour recognition systems.