Managing Persuasion Robustly: The Optimality of Quota Rules
Dirk Bergemann, Tan Gan, Yingkai Li

TL;DR
This paper analyzes a sender-receiver decision model with uncertainty, demonstrating that the optimal decision rule is always a quota rule, providing a unified robust framework covering various utility and regret criteria.
Contribution
It introduces a unified robust analysis framework for sender-receiver models and proves the optimality of quota rules across different decision criteria.
Findings
Optimal decision rule is always a quota rule.
Unified framework includes max-min utility, min-max regret, and competitive ratio.
Quota rules are robustly optimal under uncertainty.
Abstract
We study a sender-receiver model in which the receiver can commit to a decision rule before the sender determines the information policy. The decision rule can depend on the information structure chosen by the sender and the realized signals. This framework captures applications where a decision-maker (the receiver) seeks advice from an interested party (the sender). In these applications, the receiver frequently faces uncertainty regarding the sender's preferences and the set of feasible information structures. Consequently, we adopt a unified robust analysis framework that includes the max-min utility, the min-max regret, and the min-max competitive ratio as special cases. We show that the optimal decision rule is always a quota rule.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Applications · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Auction Theory and Applications
MethodsALIGN
