Precedent-Enhanced Legal Judgment Prediction with LLM and Domain-Model Collaboration
Yiquan Wu, Siying Zhou, Yifei Liu, Weiming Lu, Xiaozhong Liu, Yating, Zhang, Changlong Sun, Fei Wu, Kun Kuang

TL;DR
This paper introduces a precedent-enhanced legal judgment prediction framework that combines large language models and domain-specific models to improve accuracy by effectively utilizing legal precedents.
Contribution
It proposes a novel collaborative system integrating LLMs and domain models for legal judgment prediction, leveraging precedents more effectively than prior methods.
Findings
The framework improves prediction accuracy on real-world datasets.
Collaborative approach outperforms individual models in legal judgment tasks.
Demonstrates potential for generalization to other specialized domains.
Abstract
Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) has become an increasingly crucial task in Legal AI, i.e., predicting the judgment of the case in terms of case fact description. Precedents are the previous legal cases with similar facts, which are the basis for the judgment of the subsequent case in national legal systems. Thus, it is worthwhile to explore the utilization of precedents in the LJP. Recent advances in deep learning have enabled a variety of techniques to be used to solve the LJP task. These can be broken down into two categories: large language models (LLMs) and domain-specific models. LLMs are capable of interpreting and generating complex natural language, while domain models are efficient in learning task-specific information. In this paper, we propose the precedent-enhanced LJP framework (PLJP), a system that leverages the strength of both LLM and domain models in the context of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Law · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Comparative and International Law Studies
