Network-thinking to optimize surveillance and control of crop parasites. A review

TL;DR

This review explores how network theory has been increasingly used to model and optimize surveillance and control strategies for crop parasites, highlighting successes and gaps in applying this approach to crop protection.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive overview of the evolution and application of network theory in crop parasite management, emphasizing the need for clearer definitions and broader implementation.

Findings

Network theory successfully models diverse parasite transmission modes.

Network-based surveillance has clear objectives and tools; control strategies are less developed.

Defining nodes and edges at various scales is crucial for effective application.

Abstract

Increasing cultivated lands, crop homogenization and global food trade have fostered the spread of crop pests and diseases. Optimizing crop protection is urgently needed to ensure food safety. One aspect of crop protection is surveillance, which focuses on the early detection of a parasite, and control, aiming to fight and possibly eradicate it. Network theory has been widely used to model the spread of human and animal infectious diseases in systems described through nodes and edges. It has been successfully used to optimize monitoring and immunization campaigns. In crop protection, there is a growing literature using this theory to describe parasites spread and to conceive protection strategies. Here we review the use of network theory in crop protection, from the more descriptive to the more applied approaches aimed to optimize crop protection. We retrace the logical process that has led epidemiological models to rely on network theory, and we provide examples of how the spread of crop parasites has been represented via a network description. We define the objectives of surveillance and control, and we show how these have been declined in the network-based epidemiological sphere and then adapted in the agricultural context. We eventually discuss the discrepancy between the application of network theory in surveillance and control to identify culprits and solutions. We find that: i) scientists have successfully interpreted very different modes of parasitic transmission under the lens of network theory; ii) while network-based surveillance has progressively clarified its objectives and sound tools have been proposed, network-based control has been less studied and applied; iii) network-thinking must address how to properly define edges and nodes at different geographic scale to broad its application in crop protection.