The Bild-conception for Scientific Theory Structuring in Classical and Quantum Physics: from Hertz and Boltzmann to Schr\"odinger and De Broglie
Andrei Khrennikov

TL;DR
This paper explores the Bild concept for structuring scientific theories, analyzing classical and quantum physics models, and proposing a new prequantum classical statistical field theory within this framework.
Contribution
It introduces a novel CTM for quantum mechanics called PCSFT, based on the Bild concept, and critically examines the Bell inequality violation from a two-level theory perspective.
Findings
Proposes PCSFT as a new CTM for QM.
Critiques Bell inequality interpretation using the Bild approach.
Analyzes the two-level structuring of theories in physics.
Abstract
We start with methodological analysis of the notion of scientific theory and its interrelation with reality. This analysis is based on the works of Helmholtz, Hertz, Boltzmann, and Schr\"odinger (and reviews of D' Agostino). Following Helmholtz, Hertz established the "Bild concept" for scientific theories. Here "Bild" ("picture") carries the meaning "model" (mathematical). The main aim of natural sciences is construction of the causal theoretical models (CTMs) of natural phenomena. Hertz claimed that CTM cannot be designed solely on the basis of observational data; it typically contains hidden quantities. Experimental data can be described by an observational model (OM), often on the price of acausality. CTM-OM interrelation can be tricky. Schr\"odinger used the Bild concept to create CTM for quantum mechanics (QM) and QM was treated as OM. We follow him and suggest a special CTM for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and History of Science
