Enhancing Predictive Capabilities in Data-Driven Dynamical Modeling with Automatic Differentiation: Koopman and Neural ODE Approaches

TL;DR

This paper introduces an improved method for data-driven dynamical system prediction using automatic differentiation to enhance Koopman operator approximations and compares various approaches across complex systems.

Contribution

It presents a modified EDMD-DL method that jointly learns the dictionary and Koopman operator using automatic differentiation, outperforming existing methods.

Findings

The new method significantly outperforms EDMD-DL.

State space approach yields better predictions than pure Koopman.

Alternating between state and observable spaces achieves comparable accuracy to state space methods.

Abstract

Data-driven approximations of the Koopman operator are promising for predicting the time evolution of systems characterized by complex dynamics. Among these methods, the approach known as extended dynamic mode decomposition with dictionary learning (EDMD-DL) has garnered significant attention. Here we present a modification of EDMD-DL that concurrently determines both the dictionary of observables and the corresponding approximation of the Koopman operator. This innovation leverages automatic differentiation to facilitate gradient descent computations through the pseudoinverse. We also address the performance of several alternative methodologies. We assess a 'pure' Koopman approach, which involves the direct time-integration of a linear, high-dimensional system governing the dynamics within the space of observables. Additionally, we explore a modified approach where the system alternates between spaces of states and observables at each time step -- this approach no longer satisfies the linearity of the true Koopman operator representation. For further comparisons, we also apply a state space approach (neural ODEs). We consider systems encompassing two and three-dimensional ordinary differential equation systems featuring steady, oscillatory, and chaotic attractors, as well as partial differential equations exhibiting increasingly complex and intricate behaviors. Our framework significantly outperforms EDMD-DL. Furthermore, the state space approach offers superior performance compared to the 'pure' Koopman approach where the entire time evolution occurs in the space of observables. When the temporal evolution of the Koopman approach alternates between states and observables at each time step, however, its predictions become comparable to those of the state space approach.