A Geometrical Approach to Evaluate the Adversarial Robustness of Deep Neural Networks
Yang Wang, Bo Dong, Ke Xu, Haiyin Piao, Yufei Ding, Baocai Yin, Xin, Yang

TL;DR
This paper introduces ACTS, a new geometrical metric for evaluating the adversarial robustness of deep neural networks on specific inputs, addressing computational challenges of previous metrics like CLEVER.
Contribution
The paper proposes ACTS, a novel attack-dependent robustness metric based on local geometry, which is more efficient and effective than existing metrics like CLEVER.
Findings
ACTS correlates well with adversarial success rates.
ACTS is computationally more efficient than CLEVER.
Experiments on ImageNet demonstrate ACTS's effectiveness across different models.
Abstract
Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) are widely used for computer vision tasks. However, it has been shown that deep models are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, i.e., their performances drop when imperceptible perturbations are made to the original inputs, which may further degrade the following visual tasks or introduce new problems such as data and privacy security. Hence, metrics for evaluating the robustness of deep models against adversarial attacks are desired. However, previous metrics are mainly proposed for evaluating the adversarial robustness of shallow networks on the small-scale datasets. Although the Cross Lipschitz Extreme Value for nEtwork Robustness (CLEVER) metric has been proposed for large-scale datasets (e.g., the ImageNet dataset), it is computationally expensive and its performance relies on a tractable number of samples. In this paper, we propose the Adversarial…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
