Optimizing Sponsored Humanitarian Parole

TL;DR

This paper introduces RUTH, a novel algorithmic matching system for humanitarian parole that improves refugee placement efficiency and fairness by considering preferences and feasibility constraints.

Contribution

The paper develops and analyzes RUTH, an adapted Thakral MWP algorithm, tailored for refugee sponsorship matching with considerations for preferences, capacity, and needs.

Findings

Increasing waiting periods improves match quality.

Refugee preferences are not fully observable from data.

Higher sponsor arrival rates are needed for desirable locations.

Abstract

The United States has introduced a special humanitarian parole process for Ukrainian citizens in response to Russia 2022 invasion of Ukraine. To qualify for parole, Ukrainian applicants must have a sponsor in the United States. In collaboration with HIAS, a refugee resettlement agency involved in the parole process, we deployed RUTH (Refugees Uniting Through HIAS), a novel algorithmic matching system that is driven by the relocation preferences of refugees and the priorities of US sponsors. RUTH adapts Thakral Multiple-Waitlist Procedure (MWP) that combines the main FIFO queue with location-specific FIFO queues to effectively manage the preferences of refugees and the supply of community sponsors. RUTH also incorporates various feasibility considerations, such as community capacity religious, and medical needs. The adapted mechanism is envy-free, efficient, and strategy-proof for refugees. Our analysis shows diverse refugee location preferences, not fully explained by observables, highlighting the challenge of predicting preferences directly from them. We use our data for two counterfactual simulations. First, we consider the effects of increased waiting times for refugees on the quality of their matches. We find that with a periodic Top Trading Cycles algorithm, increasing period length from 24 days to 80 days improves the average rank of a refugees match from 3.20 to 2.44. Second, we estimate the arrival rates of sponsors in each location that would be consistent with a long-run steady state. We find that more desirable locations (regarding refugee preferences) require the highest arrival rates, suggesting that preferences might be a useful indicator for investments in sponsorship capacity. Our study highlights the potential for preference-based algorithms such as RUTH to improve the efficiency and fairness of other rapidly deployed humanitarian parole processes.