
TL;DR
This paper introduces a formal logic for unknowable truths, explores the relationship between unknown and unknowable truths, and provides an axiomatic system to understand their logical properties in epistemology.
Contribution
It is the first to develop a logical framework specifically for unknowable truths and analyze their connection with unknown truths in formal epistemology.
Findings
Proposed a new logic of unknowable truths
Analyzed the properties and relationships of unknown and unknowable truths
Axiomatized the logic to formalize their logical characteristics
Abstract
Notions of unknown truths and unknowable truths are important in formal epistemology, which are related to each other in e.g. Fitch's paradox of knowability. Although there have been some logical research on the notion of unknown truths and some philosophical discussion on the two notions, there seems to be no logical research on unknowable truths. In this paper, we propose a logic of unknowable truths, investigate the logical properties of unknown truths and unknowable truths, which includes the similarities of the two notions and the relationship between the two notions, and axiomatize this logic.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Advanced Algebra and Logic · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
