Explainable Claim Verification via Knowledge-Grounded Reasoning with Large Language Models
Haoran Wang, Kai Shu

TL;DR
This paper introduces FOLK, a knowledge-grounded reasoning method using large language models to verify complex claims and generate explanations without relying on annotated evidence, improving interpretability and performance.
Contribution
FOLK leverages in-context learning to translate claims into FOL clauses and performs FOL-guided reasoning, enabling explainable claim verification without annotated data.
Findings
FOLK outperforms strong baselines on three datasets.
It provides human-readable explanations of its reasoning.
The method effectively verifies complex claims without annotated evidence.
Abstract
Claim verification plays a crucial role in combating misinformation. While existing works on claim verification have shown promising results, a crucial piece of the puzzle that remains unsolved is to understand how to verify claims without relying on human-annotated data, which is expensive to create at a large scale. Additionally, it is important for models to provide comprehensive explanations that can justify their decisions and assist human fact-checkers. This paper presents First-Order-Logic-Guided Knowledge-Grounded (FOLK) Reasoning that can verify complex claims and generate explanations without the need for annotated evidence using Large Language Models (LLMs). FOLK leverages the in-context learning ability of LLMs to translate the claim into a First-Order-Logic (FOL) clause consisting of predicates, each corresponding to a sub-claim that needs to be verified. Then, FOLK…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
