Equivalence between individual and group strategy-proofness under stability
Pinaki Mandal

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationship between individual and group strategy-proofness in two-sided matching markets under stability, establishing an equivalence in one-to-one markets and characterizing compatible domains with single-peaked preferences.
Contribution
It proves an equivalence between individual and group strategy-proofness in one-to-one markets under certain conditions and characterizes domains with single-peaked preferences for stability and strategy-proofness.
Findings
Equivalence between individual and group strategy-proofness in one-to-one markets.
Characterization of domains with single-peaked preferences for stability.
The result does not extend to many-to-one matching markets.
Abstract
This paper studies the (group) strategy-proofness aspect of two-sided matching markets under stability. For a one-to-one matching market, we show an equivalence between individual and group strategy-proofness under stability. We obtain this equivalence assuming the domain satisfies a richness condition. However, the result cannot be extended to the many-to-one matching markets. We further consider a setting with single-peaked preferences and characterize all domains compatible for stability and (group) strategy-proofness.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Auction Theory and Applications · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
