DeepQTest: Testing Autonomous Driving Systems with Reinforcement Learning and Real-world Weather Data

TL;DR

DeepQTest is a reinforcement learning-based approach for testing autonomous driving systems by generating realistic, challenging scenarios with real-world weather data to improve safety validation.

Contribution

The paper introduces DeepQTest, a novel RL-based method that incorporates real-world weather data and safety measures to generate realistic test scenarios for ADSs.

Findings

DeepQTest outperforms baselines in generating collision scenarios.

Incorporating real-world weather improves scenario realism.

Time-To-Collision reward is most effective.

Abstract

Autonomous driving systems (ADSs) are capable of sensing the environment and making driving decisions autonomously. These systems are safety-critical, and testing them is one of the important approaches to ensure their safety. However, due to the inherent complexity of ADSs and the high dimensionality of their operating environment, the number of possible test scenarios for ADSs is infinite. Besides, the operating environment of ADSs is dynamic, continuously evolving, and full of uncertainties, which requires a testing approach adaptive to the environment. In addition, existing ADS testing techniques have limited effectiveness in ensuring the realism of test scenarios, especially the realism of weather conditions and their changes over time. Recently, reinforcement learning (RL) has demonstrated great potential in addressing challenging problems, especially those requiring constant adaptations to dynamic environments. To this end, we present DeepQTest, a novel ADS testing approach that uses RL to learn environment configurations with a high chance of revealing abnormal ADS behaviors. Specifically, DeepQTest employs Deep Q-Learning and adopts three safety and comfort measures to construct the reward functions. To ensure the realism of generated scenarios, DeepQTest defines a set of realistic constraints and introduces real-world weather conditions into the simulated environment. We employed three comparison baselines, i.e., random, greedy, and a state-of-the-art RL-based approach DeepCOllision, for evaluating DeepQTest on an industrial-scale ADS. Evaluation results show that DeepQTest demonstrated significantly better effectiveness in terms of generating scenarios leading to collisions and ensuring scenario realism compared with the baselines. In addition, among the three reward functions implemented in DeepQTest, Time-To-Collision is recommended as the best design according to our study.