PaperCard for Reporting Machine Assistance in Academic Writing
Won Ik Cho, Eunjung Cho, Kyunghyun Cho

TL;DR
This paper introduces PaperCard, a framework for transparently documenting AI assistance in academic writing, addressing authorship and ethical concerns raised by advanced language models like ChatGPT.
Contribution
It proposes a novel documentation framework, PaperCard, enabling clear declaration of AI contributions in academic papers to promote transparency and ethical authorship.
Findings
Introduces PaperCard framework for AI documentation
Addresses ethical questions of AI authorship in academia
Promotes transparency in AI-assisted writing
Abstract
Academic writing process has benefited from various technological developments over the years including search engines, automatic translators, and editing tools that review grammar and spelling mistakes. They have enabled human writers to become more efficient in writing academic papers, for example by helping with finding relevant literature more effectively and polishing texts. While these developments have so far played a relatively assistive role, recent advances in large-scale language models (LLMs) have enabled LLMs to play a more major role in the writing process, such as coming up with research questions and generating key contents. This raises critical questions surrounding the concept of authorship in academia. ChatGPT, a question-answering system released by OpenAI in November 2022, has demonstrated a range of capabilities that could be utilised in producing academic papers.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
