Where does the Born Rule come from? Superposition
David Ellerman

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the Born Rule naturally emerges from extending classical probability theory with superposition events, providing a mathematical basis for its origin without relying on physical assumptions.
Contribution
It shows that the Born Rule arises solely from adding superposition events to finite probability theory, offering a purely mathematical explanation.
Findings
Born Rule appears by extending probability theory with superposition events
The approach does not require physics-based derivation of the Born Rule
Superposition events mathematically explain the probability rule in quantum mechanics
Abstract
The Born Rule plays a critical role in quantum mechanics (QM) since it supplies the link between the mathematical formalism and experimental results in terms of probabilities. The Born Rule does not occur in ordinary probability theory. Where then does it come from? This has been a topic of considerable controversy in the literature. We take the approach of asking what is the simplest extension of ordinary probability theory where the Born rule appears. This is answered by showing that the Born Rule appears by adding the notion of superposition events (in addition to the ordinary discrete events) to finite probability theory. Hence the rule does not need any physics-based derivation. It is simply a feature of the mathematics of superposition when only superposition events are added to ordinary probability theory.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
