Gradient Descent Provably Solves Nonlinear Tomographic Reconstruction
Sara Fridovich-Keil, Fabrizio Valdivia, Gordon Wetzstein, Benjamin Recht, Mahdi Soltanolkotabi

TL;DR
This paper proves that gradient descent can reliably solve nonlinear tomographic reconstruction problems directly from raw measurements, leading to improved image quality and reduced artifacts in CT scans, especially near high-density materials.
Contribution
It provides the first theoretical guarantees for gradient descent convergence in nonlinear CT reconstruction, even with fewer measurements and structural priors.
Findings
Gradient descent converges to the global optimum at a geometric rate.
Direct nonlinear reconstruction reduces metal artifacts in CT images.
Logarithmic preprocessing alone can cause artifacts without other factors.
Abstract
In computed tomography (CT), the forward model consists of a linear Radon transform followed by an exponential nonlinearity based on the attenuation of light according to the Beer-Lambert Law. Conventional reconstruction often involves inverting this nonlinearity and then solving a linear inverse problem. However, this nonlinear measurement preprocessing is poorly conditioned in the vicinity of high-density materials, such as metal. This preprocessing makes CT reconstruction methods numerically sensitive and susceptible to artifacts near high-density regions. In this paper, we study a technique where the signal is directly reconstructed from raw measurements through the nonlinear forward model. Though this optimization is nonconvex, we show that gradient descent provably converges to the global optimum at a geometric rate, perfectly reconstructing the underlying signal with a near…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2024
The paper is interesting and relatively easy to read. The approach is also fairly straightforward, although non-trivial, and it is surprising that is has not been attempted before. The mathematical and optimisation approach is well carried out.
Experiments are unconvincing, particularly Fig.2, where except around the high-density object (the crown), the quality of the linearised reconstruction is visibly better. Since the image is a phantom, a ground-truth should have been provided. The experiments on the Shepp-Logan phantom are too simple to be convincing. Maybe this is due to a poor choice of hyper-parameter or a sub-optimal regulariser. Reference code does not seem to be provided, limiting reproducibility.
Detailed convergence analysis for the proposed algorithms would be the major strength. Besides, numerical experiments on CT data sets are conducted to justify the theoretical results.
1. The paper does not seem to use the standard ICLR paper template. 2. Regularization techniques have been widely used in solving inverse problems to address the ill-posedness. It is not clear about the contributions and novelty of the proposed approaches. 3. In the experiments, there are no other related works for comparison. So, it is hard to see whether the proposed performance is standing out.
N/A
N/A
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
