Belief Expansion in Subset Models
Eveline Lehmann, Thomas Studer

TL;DR
This paper introduces a belief expansion operator within subset models for justification logic, analyzing its properties and differences from previous symbolic approaches, thus advancing the semantics of evidence-based belief systems.
Contribution
It proposes a new belief expansion operator for subset models and compares its properties to existing symbolic methods in justification logic.
Findings
The belief expansion operator satisfies key logical properties.
Differences between subset model semantics and symbolic approaches are characterized.
The new operator enhances the understanding of evidence accumulation in justification logic.
Abstract
Subset models provide a new semantics for justifcation logic. The main idea of subset models is that evidence terms are interpreted as sets of possible worlds. A term then justifies a formula if that formula is true in each world of the interpretation of the term. In this paper, we introduce a belief expansion operator for subset models. We study the main properties of the resulting logic as well as the differences to a previous (symbolic) approach to belief expansion in justification logic.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Semantic Web and Ontologies · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
