On the ellipticity parameterization for an NFW profile: an overlooked angular structure in strong lens modeling

TL;DR

This paper investigates how different ellipticity parameterizations of NFW profiles in strong lens modeling affect the accuracy of inferred cosmological parameters, revealing biases introduced by common approximation methods.

Contribution

It demonstrates that the traditional potential-based ellipticity method introduces azimuthal biases, and recommends using the mass-based NFWm approach for more accurate lens modeling.

Findings

NFWp method biases H_0 estimates by ~3% lower than NFWm.

NFWp introduces azimuthal gradients, unlike the constant elliptical shape of NFWm.

Mass-based NFWm approach reduces azimuthal biases in lens modeling.

Abstract

Galaxy-scale gravitational lenses are often modeled with two-component mass profiles where one component represents the stellar mass and the second is an NFW profile representing the dark matter. Outside of the spherical case, the NFW profile is costly to implement, and so it is approximated via two different methods; ellipticity can be introduced via the lensing potential (NFWp) or via the mass by approximating the NFW profile as a sum of analytical profiles (NFWm). While the NFWp method has been the default for lensing applications, it gives a different prescription of the azimuthal structure, which we show introduces ubiquitous gradients in ellipticity and boxiness in the mass distribution rather than having a constant elliptical shape. Because unmodeled azimuthal structure has been shown to be able to bias lens model results, we explore the degree to which this introduced azimuthal structure can affect the model accuracy. We construct input profiles using composite models using both the NFWp and NFWm methods and fit these mocks with a power-law elliptical mass distribution (PEMD) model with external shear. As a measure of the accuracy of the recovered lensing potential, we calculate the value of the Hubble parameter $H_0$ one would determine from the lensing fit. We find that the fits to the NFWp input return $H_0$ values which are systematically biased by about $3\%$ lower than the NFWm counterparts. We explore whether such an effect is attributable to the mass sheet transformation (MST) by using an MST-independent quantity, $\xi_2$. We show that, as expected, the NFWm mocks are degenerate with PEMD through an MST. For the NFWp, an additional bias is found beyond the MST due to azimuthal structures {\it exterior to the Einstein radius}. We recommend modelers use an NFWm prescription in the future, such that azimuthal structure can be introduced explicitly rather than implicitly.