Online Clustering of Bandits with Misspecified User Models

TL;DR

This paper introduces robust clustering algorithms for contextual linear bandits that handle misspecified user models, providing theoretical regret bounds and demonstrating improved performance over existing methods.

Contribution

First to address clustering of bandits with misspecified user models, proposing two algorithms with proven regret bounds under milder assumptions.

Findings

Regret bounds match lower bounds asymptotically in T.

Algorithms outperform previous methods on synthetic and real data.

Handles model misspecification effectively.

Abstract

The contextual linear bandit is an important online learning problem where given arm features, a learning agent selects an arm at each round to maximize the cumulative rewards in the long run. A line of works, called the clustering of bandits (CB), utilize the collaborative effect over user preferences and have shown significant improvements over classic linear bandit algorithms. However, existing CB algorithms require well-specified linear user models and can fail when this critical assumption does not hold. Whether robust CB algorithms can be designed for more practical scenarios with misspecified user models remains an open problem. In this paper, we are the first to present the important problem of clustering of bandits with misspecified user models (CBMUM), where the expected rewards in user models can be perturbed away from perfect linear models. We devise two robust CB algorithms, RCLUMB and RSCLUMB (representing the learned clustering structure with dynamic graph and sets, respectively), that can accommodate the inaccurate user preference estimations and erroneous clustering caused by model misspecifications. We prove regret upper bounds of $O(\epsilon_*T\sqrt{md\log T} + d\sqrt{mT}\log T)$ for our algorithms under milder assumptions than previous CB works (notably, we move past a restrictive technical assumption on the distribution of the arms), which match the lower bound asymptotically in $T$ up to logarithmic factors, and also match the state-of-the-art results in several degenerate cases. The techniques in proving the regret caused by misclustering users are quite general and may be of independent interest. Experiments on both synthetic and real-world data show our outperformance over previous algorithms.