Can negative bare couplings make sense? The $\vec{\phi}^4$ theory at large $N$
Ryan D. Weller

TL;DR
This paper investigates the large N limit of the 3+1D scalar theory with negative bare coupling, demonstrating it is non-trivial, asymptotically free, and consistent with positive-coupling theory in thermodynamics, challenging traditional views on coupling signs.
Contribution
It shows that the theory at large N with negative coupling is well-defined, asymptotically free, and thermodynamically equivalent to the positive-coupling theory, expanding the understanding of theories.
Findings
The negative-coupling theory is non-trivial and asymptotically free.
Thermodynamic observables match between negative and positive coupling theories.
The theory exhibits a Landau pole in the IR, but remains consistent within the framework.
Abstract
Scalar theory in 3+1D, for a positive coupling constant , is known to have no interacting continuum limit, which is referred to as quantum triviality. However, it has been recently argued that the theory in 3+1D with an -component scalar and a interaction term does have an interacting continuum limit at large . It has been suggested that this continuum limit has a negative (bare) coupling constant and exhibits asymptotic freedom, similar to the -symmetric field theory. In this paper I study the theory in 3+1D at large with a negative coupling constant , and with the scalar field taking values in a -symmetric complex domain. The theory is non-trivial, has asymptotic freedom, and has a Landau pole in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics · Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research · Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
