Closed-Loop Until Further Notice: Comparing Predictive Control Methods in Closed-Loop
J. Fowler, M.A.M. van Kooten, R. Jensen-Clem

TL;DR
This paper compares predictive control methods for adaptive optics in telescopes, highlighting a new data-driven closed-loop approach that improves correction accuracy, especially when system models are imperfect.
Contribution
Introduces a closed-loop, data-driven predictive control method using empirical orthogonal functions for adaptive optics systems.
Findings
Predictive control significantly reduces RMS error in simulations.
Closed-loop EOF method performs well even with inaccurate system models.
On-sky improvements are modest compared to simulation results.
Abstract
For future extremely large telescopes, error in extreme adaptive optics systems at small angular separations will be highly impacted by the lag time of the correction, which is typically on millisecond timescales; one solution is to apply a predictive correction to catch up with the system delay. Predictive control leads to significant RMS error reductions in simulation (on the order of 5-10x improvement in RMS error compared with a standard integral controller), but shows only modest improvement on-sky (less than 2x in RMS error). This performance limitation is likely impacted by elements of pseudo open loop (POL) reconstruction, which requires assumptions about the response of the deformable mirror and accuracy of the wavefront measurements that are difficult to verify in practice. In this work, we explore a closed-loop method for data-driven prediction using a reformulated empirical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
