Estimating systemic importance with missing data in input-output graphs
Jesse Geneson, Alvin Moon, Nicolas Robles, Aaron Strong, and Jonathan, Welburn

TL;DR
This paper develops bounds on the error in estimating the importance of firms in a production network when data is incomplete, using influence vectors derived from input-output matrices, and compares these to PageRank methods.
Contribution
It provides sharp bounds on influence vector errors under incomplete data and explores extensions to other economic models and missing data distributions.
Findings
Derived bounds on influence vector errors with incomplete data
Analyzed impact of data missingness on influence measures
Compared influence vector estimates to PageRank algorithms
Abstract
In the context of the Cobb-Douglas productivity model we consider the input-output linkage matrix for a network of firms . The associated influence vector of is defined in terms of the Leontief inverse of as where , denotes the transpose of and is the identity matrix. Here is the vector whose entries are all one. The influence vector is a metric of the importance for the firms in the production network. Under the realistic assumption that the data to compute the influence vector is incomplete, we prove bounds on the worst-case error for the influence vector that are sharp up to a constant factor. We also consider the situation where the missing data is binomially distributed and contextualize the bound…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplex Network Analysis Techniques · Functional Brain Connectivity Studies · Quantum Mechanics and Applications
