Determinisation and Unambiguisation of Polynomially-Ambiguous Rational Weighted Automata
Isma\"el Jecker, Filip Mazowiecki, David Purser

TL;DR
This paper investigates the decidability and computational complexity of converting polynomially-ambiguous rational weighted automata into equivalent deterministic or unambiguous forms, establishing PSPACE bounds.
Contribution
It proves that the determinisation and unambiguisation problems for polynomially-ambiguous weighted automata are in PSPACE, providing complexity bounds for these problems.
Findings
Both problems are in PSPACE for polynomially-ambiguous automata.
Decidability of these problems was known, but complexity bounds were previously unknown.
The results extend understanding of automata determinisation over the rational field.
Abstract
We study the determinisation and unambiguisation problems of weighted automata over the rational field: Given a weighted automaton, can we determine whether there exists an equivalent deterministic, respectively unambiguous, weighted automaton? Recent results by Bell and Smertnig show that the problem is decidable, however they do not provide any complexity bounds. We show that both problems are in PSPACE for polynomially-ambiguous weighted automata.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Formal Methods in Verification · Machine Learning and Algorithms
