A negative solution to the complemented subspace problem in Banach lattices
D. de Hevia, G. Mart\'inez-Cervantes, A. Salguero-Alarc\'on, P., Tradacete

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that in Banach lattice theory, a complemented subspace need not be isomorphic to a Banach lattice, resolving a long-standing open problem.
Contribution
It provides a negative example showing complemented subspaces in Banach lattices are not necessarily Banach lattices themselves, answering a major open question.
Findings
Complemented subspaces may not be Banach lattices.
Provides a counterexample to a longstanding conjecture.
Advances understanding of structure in Banach lattices.
Abstract
Building on a recent construction of G. Plebanek and the third named author, it is shown that a complemented subspace of a Banach lattice need not be linearly isomorphic to a Banach lattice. This solves a long-standing open question in Banach lattice theory.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Banach Space Theory
