Measuring Evidence against Exchangeability and Group Invariance with E-values
Nick W. Koning

TL;DR
This paper develops a framework for designing and analyzing e-values and e-processes to test exchangeability and invariance under compact groups, unifying and extending traditional invariance tests with optimality properties.
Contribution
It introduces a general method for constructing e-values for group invariance, characterizes their optimality, and extends the concept to e-processes and ergodic theorems for broader applicability.
Findings
Characterization of e-values for group invariance.
Design of optimal e-values including Neyman-Pearson and log-optimal.
Development of e-processes for arbitrary filtrations and ergodic settings.
Abstract
We study e-values for quantifying evidence against exchangeability and general invariance of a random variable under a compact group. We start by characterizing such e-values, and explaining how they nest traditional group invariance tests as a special case. We show they can be easily designed for an arbitrary test statistic, and computed through Monte Carlo sampling. We prove a result that characterizes optimal e-values for group invariance against optimality targets that satisfy a mild orbit-wise decomposition property. We apply this to design expected-utility-optimal e-values for group invariance, which include both Neyman-Pearson-optimal tests and log-optimal e-values. Moreover, we generalize the notion of rank- and sign-based testing to compact groups, by using a representative inversion kernel. In addition, we characterize e-processes for group invariance for arbitrary…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
