Neural Processing of Tri-Plane Hybrid Neural Fields
Adriano Cardace, Pierluigi Zama Ramirez, Francesco Ballerini, Allan, Zhou, Samuele Salti, Luigi Di Stefano

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that tri-plane neural fields encode rich information that can be effectively processed with standard deep learning methods, achieving superior task performance compared to large MLPs and nearly matching explicit representations.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach to process tri-plane neural fields directly, establishing a benchmark and showing superior performance over traditional MLP-based methods.
Findings
Tri-plane neural fields encode rich, processable information.
Processing tri-plane fields yields better task performance than large MLPs.
Achieves near-par performance with explicit 3D representations.
Abstract
Driven by the appealing properties of neural fields for storing and communicating 3D data, the problem of directly processing them to address tasks such as classification and part segmentation has emerged and has been investigated in recent works. Early approaches employ neural fields parameterized by shared networks trained on the whole dataset, achieving good task performance but sacrificing reconstruction quality. To improve the latter, later methods focus on individual neural fields parameterized as large Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs), which are, however, challenging to process due to the high dimensionality of the weight space, intrinsic weight space symmetries, and sensitivity to random initialization. Hence, results turn out significantly inferior to those achieved by processing explicit representations, e.g., point clouds or meshes. In the meantime, hybrid representations, in…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2024 poster
I like the topics this paper explores. Instead of directly consuming raw and messy 3D data, we could represent that data using neural representation, which will make the network design much easier. The presented method achieves the significantly improved results compared with baselines. Although the proposed method is not novel -- simply replacing MLP with the more effective triplane, it shows better performance than the network that takes in raw discrete 3D dataset, which suggests a new parad
Parameter and time efficiency comparison is missing. We know that triplanes work better than global MLP. However, there was no free lunch. Triplane-based is usually parameter-intensive. So I’m concerned that the triplane based representation would consume lots of space compared with the original dataset. And the paper doesn’t report any comparison. Also I notice that the paper uses the explicit extracted from the learned triplane in the classification tasks of Table3. I’m not very sure if it m
- The proposed approach introduces a versatile method for encoding object representations across various neural fields. - Classification using learned tri-plane features demonstrates superior performance compared to other existing NeRF encoding methods that rely solely on MLP parameters. - The authors also explore different techniques for reshaping tri-plane feature tensors to ensure that predictions remain invariant to channel permutations.
- The proposed method necessitates per-object optimization to acquire individual tri-plane features. The author conducted a comparative analysis of object reconstruction using this technique against other solutions, which employed a shared network trained on the entire dataset, like Functa (Dupont et al.). They reported the performance and the number of parameters (see Table 1). However, it is worth noting that the required computational resources, particularly in terms of training time, have no
- The idea of using fitted triplanes as embeddings for downstream tasks is simple but seems effective and has not been analyzed before to my knowledge. - The results clearly show the better trade-off compared to previous methods. - The method is evaluated on a diverse set of tasks and function representations. - The insight regarding channel invariance is interesting and leads to the conclusion that transformers are better than CNNs, which seem unintuitive at first. - The authors provide a bench
- The idea of using fitted triplanes for downstream tasks like classification is "obvious" in a sense. - There is the general question of what the relevant application of the proposed approach might be. This is a problem for all methods that aim to solve downstream tasks on optimized neural field representations. Usually, data (images or point clouds, etc) was used to obtain the neural field in the first place. Solving the downstream tasks on this input representation instead of the neural field
Code & Models
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Neural Network Applications · 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis · Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
MethodsFocus
