Comparative Analysis of Technical and Legal Frameworks of Various National Digial Identity Solutions
Montassar Naghmouchi, Maryline Laurent, Claire Levallois-Barth, Nesrine Kaaniche

TL;DR
This paper compares national digital identity systems across different countries, analyzing their technological and legal aspects, and advocates for self-sovereign identity solutions based on Blockchain technology.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of digital identity frameworks and emphasizes the importance of legal and technological considerations, promoting blockchain-based self-sovereign identities.
Findings
Diversity in technologies and architectures of national digital identity systems
Legal frameworks are crucial for sovereignty and privacy
Self-sovereign identities on Blockchain are favored by authors
Abstract
National digital identity systems have become a key requirement for easy access to online public services, specially during Covid-19. While many countries have adopted a national digital identity system, many are still in the process of establishing one. Through a comparative analysis of the technological and legal dimensions of a few selected national digital identity solutions currently being used in different countries, we highlight the diversity of technologies and architectures and the key role of the legal framework of a given digital identity solution. We also present several key issues related to the implementation of these solutions, how to ensure the State sovereignty over them, and how to strike the right balance between private sector and public sector needs. This position paper aims to help policy makers, software developers and concerned users understand the challenges of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
