The Recursive Arrival Problem
Thomas Webster (University of Edinburgh)

TL;DR
This paper introduces Recursive Arrival, an extension of the Arrival problem involving recursive switching graphs, and analyzes its computational complexity, showing it lies in NP ∩ coNP and is P-hard, with connections to complexity classes like UEOPL and EOPL.
Contribution
It extends the Arrival problem to recursive graphs and provides complexity bounds, including containment in NP ∩ coNP and P-hardness, with implications for related complexity classes.
Findings
Recursive Arrival is in NP ∩ coNP.
A search version of Recursive Arrival is in UEOPL, and thus in EOPL.
Recursive Arrival decision problem is P-hard.
Abstract
We study an extension of the Arrival problem, called Recursive Arrival, inspired by Recursive State Machines, which allows for a family of switching graphs that can call each other in a recursive way. We study the computational complexity of deciding whether a Recursive Arrival instance terminates at a given target vertex. We show this problem is contained in NP \cap coNP, and we show that a search version of the problem lies in UEOPL, and hence in EOPL = PLS \cap PPAD. Furthermore, we show P-hardness of the Recursive Arrival decision problem. By contrast, the current best-known hardness result for Arrival is PL-hardness.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
