A Novel Computational and Modeling Foundation for Automatic Coherence Assessment
Aviya Maimon, Reut Tsarfaty

TL;DR
This paper introduces a formal, computational framework for assessing text coherence based on linguistic principles, enabling large-scale automatic evaluation crucial for NLP tasks like summarization and generation.
Contribution
It formalizes coherence into three computational tasks grounded in linguistic theory and demonstrates that joint training on these tasks improves coherence assessment performance.
Findings
Joint training on coherence tasks outperforms task-specific models
The approach achieves better correlation with human judgments
Provides a scalable foundation for automatic coherence evaluation
Abstract
Coherence is an essential property of well-written texts, that refers to the way textual units relate to one another. In the era of generative AI, coherence assessment is essential for many NLP tasks; summarization, generation, long-form question-answering, and more. However, in NLP {coherence} is an ill-defined notion, not having a formal definition or evaluation metrics, that would allow for large-scale automatic and systematic coherence assessment. To bridge this gap, in this work we employ the formal linguistic definition of \citet{Reinhart:1980} of what makes a discourse coherent, consisting of three conditions -- {\em cohesion, consistency} and {\em relevance} -- and formalize these conditions as respective computational tasks. We hypothesize that (i) a model trained on all of these tasks will learn the features required for coherence detection, and that (ii) a joint model for all…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNatural Language Processing Techniques · Topic Modeling · Text Readability and Simplification
