Learning Informative Latent Representation for Quantum State Tomography
Hailan Ma, Zhenhong Sun, Daoyi Dong, Dong Gong

TL;DR
This paper introduces a transformer-based autoencoder for quantum state tomography that effectively reconstructs quantum states from imperfect measurement data, outperforming traditional methods.
Contribution
It proposes a novel transformer-based autoencoder architecture with pre-training for improved quantum state reconstruction under realistic, imperfect measurement conditions.
Findings
The method accurately reconstructs quantum states from noisy data.
Pre-training enhances the model's ability to handle imperfect measurements.
Simulations show superior performance over conventional QST techniques.
Abstract
Quantum state tomography (QST) is the process of reconstructing the complete state of a quantum system (mathematically described as a density matrix) through a series of different measurements. These measurements are performed on a number of identical copies of the quantum system, with outcomes gathered as frequencies. QST aims to recover the density matrix or the properties of the quantum state from the measured frequencies. Although an informationally complete set of measurements can specify the quantum state accurately in an ideal scenario with a large number of identical copies, both the measurements and identical copies are restricted and imperfect in practical scenarios, making QST highly ill-posed. The conventional QST methods usually assume accurate measured frequencies or rely on manually designed regularizers to handle the ill-posed reconstruction problem, suffering from…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2024 Conference Withdrawn Submission
The utilization of deep learning techniques to improve quantum state tomography (QST) represents an emerging and promising field. Nevertheless, the current body of work focused on designing specialized learning models for quantum state tomography remains relatively limited. The submission effectively addresses this gap and presents intriguing results.
The primary weakness of the submission stems from inaccuracies in statements and the presence of confusing settings. The presence of incorrect or imprecise statements obscures the novelty and technical contributions of the proposed method. Additionally, while the authors have conducted a series of numerical simulations, the absence of a comparative analysis with state-of-the-art methods hinders our ability to gauge the practical advancements offered by the proposed method.
One significant advantage of this method is its capability to provide more comprehensive information when dealing with imperfect measurement data. By using a transformer-based encoder, it effectively extracts latent information from imperfect measurement data, improving the accuracy of quantum state estimation.
Please review the comments below.
- This manuscript presents a versatile model capable of simultaneously performing quantum tomography and predicting quantum properties. - The paper introduces a pre-training strategy aimed at enhancing the robustness of the proposed model. - This paper applies the proposed model to quantum state tomography of arbitrary quantum states rather than focusing on specific states or predefined quantum state sets.
- I have doubts about the scalability of the proposed model for large-scale quantum systems, especially considering the exponential growth in the number of cube operators required. This implies that the dimension of the input layer for this model would increase exponentially . If this holds true, the resulting model would become exceedingly large when applied to large-scale quantum systems. For another, the experiments about QST in this paper are limited to 2-qubit and 4-qubit quantum states.
- The paper introduces a novel and interesting idea of building Transformer-based neural network for quantum state tomography. - The paper clearly introduces the QST preliminaries, well presents the ill-posed challenge for QST and insightfully discusses the related works. - The experiment result shows that transformer auto-encoder can reconstruct quantum states far better than the baseline models from imperfect measurement data.
- The idea of using transformer self-attention layers for QST is not strongly motivated, and hence not theoretically sound to me. - The model does scales poorly with the number of qubits due to the exponential number of operators in a complete set of QST measurement, so the contribution is limited. - The latent representation contains a mixture of encoded features and raw input features. This seems not reasonable in principle for transformer-based models, especially when the raw features and
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlind Source Separation Techniques · Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods · Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
