
TL;DR
This paper explores the topological structure of resource distribution spaces on trees, revealing they are homotopy equivalent to wedges of spheres and depend only on resource and node counts.
Contribution
It introduces Stirling complexes as cubical complexes modeling resource distributions and proves their homotopy equivalence to wedges of spheres, independent of tree structure.
Findings
Stirling complexes are homotopy equivalent to wedges of spheres.
The homotopy type depends only on resource and node counts.
Provides combinatorial formulas for counting spheres.
Abstract
In this paper we study natural reconfiguration spaces associated to the problem of distributing a fixed number of resources to labeled nodes of a tree network, so that no node is left empty. These spaces turn out to be cubical complexes, which can be thought of as higher-dimensional geometric extensions of the combinatorial Stirling problem of partitioning a set of named objects into non-empty labeled parts. As our main result, we prove that these Stirling complexes are always homotopy equivalent to wedges of spheres of the same dimension. Furthermore, we provide several combinatorial formulae to count these spheres. Somewhat surprisingly, the homotopy type of the Stirling complexes turns out to depend only on the number of resources and the number of the labeled nodes, not on the actual structure of the tree network.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
