Non-formality of Galois cohomology modulo all primes
Alexander Merkurjev, Federico Scavia

TL;DR
This paper constructs specific field extensions demonstrating that the Galois cohomology ring's structure is not formal, thereby disproving the Strong Massey Vanishing Conjecture at a prime $p$ and answering a question posed by Positselski.
Contribution
It provides explicit counterexamples showing the non-formality of Galois cohomology modulo all primes, challenging previous assumptions about the structure of these cohomology rings.
Findings
Existence of field extensions where Massey products vanish but are not defined.
Counterexamples to the Strong Massey Vanishing Conjecture at prime $p$.
Demonstration that the cochain differential graded ring is not formal.
Abstract
Let be a prime number and let be a field of characteristic different from . We prove that there exist a field extension and in such that in but is not defined over . Thus the Strong Massey Vanishing Conjecture at the prime fails for , and the cochain differential graded ring of the absolute Galois group of is not formal. This answers a question of Positselski.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
