Crystalline representations and Wach modules in the relative case II
Abhinandan

TL;DR
This paper extends the theory of Wach modules to the relative case, establishing categorical equivalences, purity results, and criteria for crystallinity in relative crystalline representations, with interpretations as modules with $q$-connections.
Contribution
It generalizes Wach modules to the relative setting, proving categorical equivalence with lattices in relative crystalline representations and connecting them to $q$-connections.
Findings
Categorical equivalence between relative Wach modules and lattices in relative crystalline representations.
A purity statement for relative crystalline representations.
A criterion for checking the crystallinity of relative $p$-adic representations.
Abstract
We study relative Wach modules generalising our previous works on this subject. Our main result shows a categorical equivalence between relative Wach modules and lattices inside relative crystalline representations. Using this result, we deduce a purity statement for relative crystalline representations and provide a criteria for checking crystallinity of relative -adic representations. Furthermore, we interpret relative Wach modules as modules with -connections, and show that for a crystalline representation, its associated Wach module together with the Nygaard filtration is the canonical -deformation (after inverting ) of the filtered -module associated to the representation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Geometry · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
