The number of realisations of a rigid graph in Euclidean and spherical geometries
Sean Dewar, Georg Grasegger

TL;DR
This paper proves that for any dimension, the number of complex realisations of a rigid graph in Euclidean space is always less than or equal to the number of spherical realisations, extending previous results and introducing coning techniques.
Contribution
It establishes a universal inequality between Euclidean and spherical realisation counts for all dimensions using new coning methods.
Findings
The inequality c_d(G) ≤ c_d^*(G) holds for all d-rigid graphs.
Introduces coning as a technique to relate Euclidean and spherical realisations.
Confirms previous partial results for higher dimensions.
Abstract
A graph is -rigid if for any generic realisation of the graph in (equivalently, the -dimensional sphere ), there are only finitely many non-congruent realisations in the same space with the same edge lengths. By extending this definition to complex realisations in a natural way, we define to be the number of equivalent -dimensional complex realisations of a -rigid graph for a given generic realisation, and to be the number of equivalent -dimensional complex spherical realisations of for a given generic spherical realisation. Somewhat surprisingly, these two realisation numbers are not always equal. Recently developed algorithms for computing realisation numbers determined that the inequality holds for any minimally 2-rigid graph with 12 vertices or less. In this paper we confirm that, for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStructural Analysis and Optimization · Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation · Advanced Materials and Mechanics
