Selective Nonparametric Regression via Testing
Fedor Noskov, Alexander Fishkov, Maxim Panov

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel nonparametric regression method that incorporates hypothesis testing for selective prediction, accounting for variance uncertainty, with proven risk bounds and empirical validation.
Contribution
It develops a new abstention procedure for heteroskedastic regression based on testing variance hypotheses, considering variance uncertainty, and provides theoretical risk bounds.
Findings
Non-asymptotic risk bounds established for the estimator.
Multiple convergence regimes identified and analyzed.
Experimental validation on simulated and real data confirms effectiveness.
Abstract
Prediction with the possibility of abstention (or selective prediction) is an important problem for error-critical machine learning applications. While well-studied in the classification setup, selective approaches to regression are much less developed. In this work, we consider the nonparametric heteroskedastic regression problem and develop an abstention procedure via testing the hypothesis on the value of the conditional variance at a given point. Unlike existing methods, the proposed one allows to account not only for the value of the variance itself but also for the uncertainty of the corresponding variance predictor. We prove non-asymptotic bounds on the risk of the resulting estimator and show the existence of several different convergence regimes. Theoretical analysis is illustrated with a series of experiments on simulated and real-world data.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Algorithms · Statistical Methods and Inference · Machine Learning and Data Classification
