TraCE: Trajectory Counterfactual Explanation Scores
Jeffrey N. Clark, Edward A. Small, Nawid Keshtmand, Michelle W.L. Wan,, Elena Fillola Mayoral, Enrico Werner, Christopher P. Bourdeaux, Raul, Santos-Rodriguez

TL;DR
TraCE introduces a model-agnostic framework to evaluate progress in sequential decision making using counterfactual explanations, demonstrated across healthcare and climate change domains.
Contribution
The paper presents TraCE scores, a novel modular method to quantify progress in complex sequential decision tasks through counterfactuals.
Findings
TraCE effectively summarizes progress in healthcare decision scenarios.
TraCE scores are applicable to climate change policy evaluation.
The framework is model-agnostic and adaptable across domains.
Abstract
Counterfactual explanations, and their associated algorithmic recourse, are typically leveraged to understand, explain, and potentially alter a prediction coming from a black-box classifier. In this paper, we propose to extend the use of counterfactuals to evaluate progress in sequential decision making tasks. To this end, we introduce a model-agnostic modular framework, TraCE (Trajectory Counterfactual Explanation) scores, which is able to distill and condense progress in highly complex scenarios into a single value. We demonstrate TraCE's utility across domains by showcasing its main properties in two case studies spanning healthcare and climate change.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Machine Learning in Healthcare
MethodsCounterfactuals Explanations
