Enumerating pattern-avoiding permutations by leading terms
\"Omer E\u{g}ecio\u{g}lu, Collier Gaiser, Mei Yin

TL;DR
This paper provides a direct counting proof for the enumeration of pattern-avoiding permutations with fixed leading terms, extends the analysis to fixed prefixes, and classifies Wilf-equivalence classes for patterns of length three.
Contribution
It offers a new proof method, generalizes enumeration to fixed prefixes, and classifies Wilf-equivalence classes for classical and vincular patterns of length three.
Findings
Enumeration formulas depend on prefix length, extrema, and order statistics.
Exact counts for permutations avoiding specific patterns with fixed prefixes.
Classification of Wilf-equivalence classes for patterns of length three.
Abstract
The number of 123-avoiding permutation on with a fixed leading terms is counted by the ballot numbers. The same holds for -avoiding permutations. These results were proved by Miner and Pak using the Robinson-Schensted-Knuth (RSK) correspondence to connect permutations with Dyck paths. In this paper, we first provide an alternate proof of these enumeration results via a direct counting argument. We then study the number of pattern-avoiding permutations with a fixed prefix of length , generalizing the case. We find exact expressions for single and pairs of patterns of length three as well as the pair and . These expressions depend on , the extrema, and the order statistics. We also define -Wilf equivalence for permutations with a single fixed leading term , and classify the -Wilf-equivalence classes for both classical and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics · Algorithms and Data Compression
