A user study of visualisations of spatio-temporal eye tracking data
Marcel Claus, Frouke Hermens, Stefano Bromuri

TL;DR
This study compares four spatio-temporal eye movement visualization techniques through a user study, revealing that the effectiveness depends on data type, question, and visualization, with no single best method.
Contribution
It provides an empirical comparison of four visualization methods for eye tracking data, highlighting the importance of context in choosing the appropriate visualization.
Findings
AOIs improve graph interpretability
Scanpath visualization performs worse without AOIs
No influence of graph-reading experience on accuracy
Abstract
Eye movements have a spatial (where people look), but also a temporal (when people look) component. Various types of visualizations have been proposed that take this spatio-temporal nature of the data into account, but it is unclear how well each one can be interpreted and whether such interpretation depends on the question asked about the data or the nature of the data-set that is being visualised. In this study, four spatio-temporal visualization techniques for eye movements (chord diagram, scanpath, scarfplot, space-time cube) were compared in a user study. Participants (N = 25) answered three questions (what region first, what region most, which regions most between) about each visualization, which was based on two types of data-sets (eye movements towards adverts, eye movements towards pairs of gambles). Accuracy of the answers depended on a combination of the data-set, the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsData Visualization and Analytics · Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
