Cyber Security Requirements for Platforms Enhancing AI Reproducibility
Polra Victor Falade

TL;DR
This paper introduces a cyber security evaluation framework for AI reproducibility platforms, assesses five popular platforms, and highlights security gaps while offering tailored security enhancement recommendations.
Contribution
The study presents a novel cyber security evaluation framework for AI platforms and applies it to assess and improve their security features for reproducibility.
Findings
None of the platforms fully incorporate necessary cyber security measures.
Kaggle and Codalab perform better in security, privacy, usability, and trust.
The framework is versatile and applicable beyond AI platforms.
Abstract
Scientific research is increasingly reliant on computational methods, posing challenges for ensuring research reproducibility. This study focuses on the field of artificial intelligence (AI) and introduces a new framework for evaluating AI platforms for reproducibility from a cyber security standpoint to address the security challenges associated with AI research. Using this framework, five popular AI reproducibility platforms; Floydhub, BEAT, Codalab, Kaggle, and OpenML were assessed. The analysis revealed that none of these platforms fully incorporates the necessary cyber security measures essential for robust reproducibility. Kaggle and Codalab, however, performed better in terms of implementing cyber security measures covering aspects like security, privacy, usability, and trust. Consequently, the study provides tailored recommendations for different user scenarios, including…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScientific Computing and Data Management
MethodsNone
