Observational Constraints and Cosmological Implications of Scalar-Tensor $f(R, T)$ Gravity

TL;DR

This paper tests scalar-tensor $f(R,T)$ gravity models against observational data, revealing that one model is statistically favored over $ ext{Lambda}$CDM and both predict late-time cosmic acceleration with particle creation or annihilation processes.

Contribution

It provides the first observational constraints on scalar-tensor $f(R,T)$ gravity models using MCMC analysis and cosmographic parameters, comparing their statistical performance to $ ext{Lambda}$CDM.

Findings

Model 1 is statistically favored over $ ext{Lambda}$CDM.

Model 1 exhibits continuous particle creation.

Model 2 allows for particle annihilation at high redshifts.

Abstract

Recently, the scalar-tensor representation of $f (R,T)$ gravity was used to explore gravitationally induced particle production/annihilation. Using the framework of irreversible thermodynamics of open systems in the presence of matter creation/annihilation, the physical and cosmological consequences of this setup were investigated in detail. In this paper, we test observationally the scalar-tensor representation of $f(R,T)$ gravity in the context of the aforementioned framework, using the Hubble and Pantheon+ measurements. The best fit parameters are obtained by solving numerically the modified Friedmann equations of two distinct cosmological models in scalar tensor $f(R, T)$ gravity, corresponding to two different choices of the potential, and by performing a Markov Chain Monte Carlo analysis. The best parameters are used to compute the cosmographic parameters, i.e., the deceleration, the jerk and the snap parameters. Using the output resulting from the Markov Chain Monte Carlo analysis, the cosmological evolution of the creation pressure and of the matter creation rates are presented for both models. To figure out the statistical significance of the studied scalar-tensor $f(R,T)$ gravity, the Bayesian and the corrected Akaike information criteria are used. The latter indicates that the first considered model in scalar tensor $f(R,T)$ gravity is statistically better than $\Lambda$CDM, i.e., it is more favored by observations. Besides, a continuous particle creation process is present in Model 1. On the other hand, for large redshifts, in Model 2 the particle creation rate may become negative, thus indicating the presence of particle annihilation processes. However, both models lead to an accelerating expansion of the Universe at late times, with a deceleration parameter equivalent to that of the $\Lambda$CDM model.