Microlensing Discovery and Characterization Efficiency in the Vera C. Rubin Legacy Survey of Space and Time
Natasha S. Abrams, Markus P.G. Hundertmark, Somayeh Khakpash, Rachel, A. Street, R. Lynne Jones, Jessica R. Lu, Etienne Bachelet, Yiannis Tsapras,, Marc Moniez, Tristan Blaineauu, Rosanne Di Stefano, Martin Makler, Anibal, Varela, and Markus Rabus

TL;DR
The paper evaluates the efficiency of microlensing event discovery and characterization in the Vera C. Rubin LSST, emphasizing the importance of survey strategy, footprint, and cadence for detecting exoplanets, stars, and black holes.
Contribution
It introduces metrics for assessing microlensing discovery and characterization efficiencies within Rubin's survey simulations and analyzes how survey design impacts these efficiencies.
Findings
Longer duration and larger parallax events are more efficiently discovered and characterized.
Focusing observations on high-density regions improves microlensing detection rates.
Wide-area surveys with low stellar density reduce event characterization quality.
Abstract
The Vera C. Rubin Legacy Survey of Space and Time will discover thousands of microlensing events across the Milky Way Galaxy, allowing for the study of populations of exoplanets, stars, and compact objects. We evaluate numerous survey strategies simulated in the Rubin Operation Simulations (OpSims) to assess the discovery and characterization efficiencies of microlensing events. We have implemented three metrics in the Rubin Metric Analysis Framework: a discovery metric and two characterization metrics, where one estimates how well the lightcurve is covered and the other quantifies how precisely event parameters can be determined. We also assess the characterizability of microlensing parallax, critical for detection of free-floating black hole lenses. We find that, given Rubin's baseline cadence, the discovery and characterization efficiency will be higher for longer duration and larger…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstronomy and Astrophysical Research · Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies · Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
