Why most papers on filters are really trivial (including this one)
Paolo Aglian\`o

TL;DR
This paper argues that many research papers on filters in residuated structures are trivial, as their results are simple consequences of well-known, more general theorems, highlighting a need for more substantial contributions.
Contribution
It demonstrates that numerous filter-related results in residuated structures are not novel but are straightforward corollaries of existing, established theorems.
Findings
Many filter papers are trivial consequences of known results
The paper clarifies the redundancy in existing literature
Encourages more meaningful research contributions
Abstract
The aim of this note is to show that many papers on various kinds of filters (and related concepts) in (subreducts of) residuated structures are in fact easy consequences of more general results that have been known for a long time.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsChemical Synthesis and Reactions
